Formal discussion of a proposed landscape maintenance contract never got off the ground during the Wednesday, January 26 Open Meeting of the Seven Lakes Landowners Association [SLLA] after a rancorous public comment period revealed that the $146,400 proposal had not been reviewed by the Finance Committee, did not have the support of the majority of landowners present, and had not been considered alongside other options, as requested by the Infrastructure Committee.
The question of whether the community is best served by an in-house maintenance department versus a professional outsourced service has been debated on and off for some time, but the Board’s recent decision to solicit bids surprised many, since the topic has not been discussed in any open meetings this year -- including the January 11 Work Session at which the proposed contract was placed on the agenda for a vote.
The last time the Board publicly discussed the idea of outsourcing maintenance was in 2009, following an in-house cost analysis performed by former maintenance supervisor Bob Darr (who is currently running for a seat on the Board). At the time, Darr recommended against outsourcing; and, later that year, the Board postponed any further discussion to allow new management an opportunity to evaluate the department and make its own recommendation.
Speaking during Wednesday night's meeting, Darr said his 2009 analysis, using a methodology approved by the Finance Committee, determined that in-house mowing costs totaled $57,400 annually, including wages, benefits, equipment depreciation, seed, fertilizer, and fuel. The lowest bid solicited in 2009 for the same work totaled $98,000.
Darr questioned the contract now being proposed, which, at $146,4000, is more than two and a half times his estimate for in-house costs.
“At a minimum, I ask you to table this until a timely and thorough analysis can be done -- open and not behind closed doors,” said Darr.
Formally introducing themselves to the voters, the four candidates for the Seven Lakes West Landowners Association [SLWLA] Board of Directors provided brief statements during the Tuesday, January 25 Work Session.
The Planning Department is expected to bring recommendations to the Board's February 1 or February 15 regular meeting.
Addressing the Village Council on behalf of John McKean, who owns a significant portion of the property to be assessed, attorney John May argued that the Village was asking his client to pay more than his fair share of the cost.